Friday, May 10

High City traders throw weight behind Hammerson in stand-off with Lighthouse

A pair of main City establishments have thrown their weight behind Britain’s largest procuring centre proprietor amid calls for from its largest shareholder to hurry up asset gross sales and resume dividend funds.

Sky News can reveal Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) and Schroders, which between them personal greater than 6% of Hammerson, are backing its board’s technique within the face of a proxy battle.

Hammerson owns a number of the UK’s landmark retail locations, together with Brent Cross in northwest London.

It is chaired by Rob Noel, the previous Land Securities boss and one in all Britain’s most skilled property figures.

Lighthouse, the funding automobile of former Hammerson director Desmond de Beer, which holds practically 23% of the corporate, has tabled resolutions to nominate two new board members due to its discontent over the corporate’s technique.

Its marketing campaign started to unravel on Friday, nevertheless, when APG, the second-largest investor with 20% of the inventory, additionally opposed Lighthouse’s proposals.

In an announcement issued to Sky News, a Schroders spokesperson stated: “As a long-term lively investor in Hammerson, our intention is to make use of our affect to have interaction constructively and thoughtfully with the businesses wherein we make investments.

“We support the board’s strategy of divestment and deleveraging, and believe the current board is well-positioned in regards to skills, experience and diversity.

“As such, we won’t be supporting the shareholder resolutions proposed by Lighthouse Properties plc on the upcoming annual assembly.”

Meanwhile, an LGIM spokesperson stated it remained “supportive of Hammerson’s board and the management team, and we agree with the decision to retain cash to further strengthen the balance sheet rather than paying a final dividend for 2022”.

“Our view is that the resolutions proposed would act to destabilise the board and disrupt the organisation.

“Long-term shareholder worth creation ought to proceed to be the precedence for Hammerson, and at this level we consider the board composition because it stands is perfect to ship this.”

Read extra enterprise information:
Ford hands-free automotive to be allowed on British motorways
Aldi weighs in as M&S accused of T-shirt ‘ripping off’ pub
Big changes coming to Reddit

Call for ‘disciplined management’

Moerus Capital Management and Stanlib, which collectively hold 2% of Hammerson’s shares, also oppose Lighthouse.

In a letter published in Hammerson’s annual report, Lighthouse had said it did “not have faith within the Hammerson board as at present constituted, having regard to the operational and strategic weaknesses mirrored in Hammerson”.

Mr de Beer, who quit the company’s board last October, expressed unhappiness at its record of reducing administration costs.

“Relative to the dimensions of its managed portfolio, Hammerson’s administration prices have elevated and objectively are excessive,” Lighthouse said.

“This is a matter Hammerson can rectify within the quick time period by means of disciplined administration,” it added.

Lighthouse added that Hammerson, led by CEO Rita-Rose Gagne, had shifted its focus “away from its core proposition as a retail REIT [real estate investment trust]”.

“Despite proudly owning world-class malls which proceed to carry out effectively, Hammerson trades at a reduction to web asset worth of over 50%,” it added.

It wants Hammerson to sell its stake in Value Retail, which operates the Bicester Village flagship retail destination.

Lighthouse said it would vote against the re-election of “at the very least” two of Hammerson’s non-executives at the AGM in early May, and has nominated Nick Hughes and Craig Tate as replacement directors.

‘Unnecessary, distracting… destructive’

“Lighthouse’s proposals are pointless, distracting and worth damaging. It is the Board’s view that neither nominee has the expertise or expertise that can be additive to our board and it could not be useful to nominate them,” a Hammerson spokesman said.

“The board is assured that the technique and management workforce is the fitting one and our efficiency clearly demonstrates sturdy strategic, operational and monetary progress,” he added.

It is just not the primary time that Hammerson has confronted unrest from activist traders.

In 2018, Elliott Advisers took a stake within the firm and pushed for belongings gross sales, earlier than reaching a compromise deal over the possible reshaping of its board.

Hammerson subsequently raised £550m in a rights difficulty because it contended with the impression of the pandemic, and likewise misplaced its chairman and chief govt in brief order.

It has been engaged in a protracted programme of disposals which continued this week with the sale of a big Parisian procuring centre.

On Friday, shares in Hammerson have been buying and selling at round 25.9p, valuing the corporate at £1.27bn.

Content Source: information.sky.com