Wednesday, May 15

U.S. army prepares for potential Sudan embassy evacuation

WASHINGTON — The Pentagon is shifting further troops and tools to a Naval base within the tiny Gulf of Aden nation of Djibouti to arrange for the potential evacuation of U.S. Embassy personnel from Sudan.

Two Biden administration officers say the deployments to Camp Lemmonier in Djibouti are needed due to the present unsure scenario in Sudan, the place preventing is raging between two warring factions.

The officers spoke on situation of anonymity to explain the administration’s planning for a possible evacuation. That planning acquired underway in earnest on Monday after a U.S. Embassy convoy was attacked in Khartoum, the Sudanese capital.

In an announcement Thursday, the Pentagon stated it’ll deploy “additional capabilities” to the area to doubtlessly assist facilitate an evacuation of embassy personnel from Sudan if required, however offered no particulars, and didn’t state the placement.

National Security Council spokesman John Kirby stated the choice to arrange for a potential evacuation was made by President Joe Biden within the “last couple of days.” The president “authorized the military to move forward with pre-positioning forces and to develop options,” Kirby advised reporters on the White House.

“There’s no indication that either side is deliberately going after or trying to hurt or target Americans,” Kirby stated. “But it’s obviously a dangerous situation.”

Security circumstances in Khartoum and elsewhere have to this point prevented the State Department from implementing a so-called “ordered departure,” a transfer that may require staffers to go away the nation.

Since hostilities between the 2 factions erupted final weekend, the U.S. has been considering the evacuation of presidency staff and has been transporting them from their properties to a safe, centralized location to arrange for such an eventuality.

The officers stated Djibouti, a small nation on the Gulf of Aden sandwiched between Ethiopia, Eritrea and Somalia, would be the staging level for any evacuation operation.

However, any evacuation within the present circumstances is fraught with issue and safety dangers as Khartoum’s airport stays non-functional and overland routes from the capital overseas are lengthy and dangerous even with out the present hostilities.

If a safe touchdown zone in or close to Khartoum can’t be discovered, one possibility can be to drive evacuees to Port Sudan on the Red Sea. But that could be a 12-hour journey and the roads over the 523-mile (841-kilometer) route are treacherous.

Another may be to drive to neighboring Eritrea, nonetheless that may even be problematic on condition that Eritrea’s chief, Isaias Afwerki, just isn’t a pal of the U.S. or the West basically.

The final time the U.S. evacuated embassy personnel overland was from Libya in July 2014, when a big convoy of U.S. army automobiles drove workers from the Tripoli embassy to Tunisia. There have been newer evacuations, most notably in Afghanistan and Yemen, however these have been carried out largely by air.

Copyright © 2023 The Washington Times, LLC.

Content Source: www.washingtontimes.com