Former Twitter staff say that CEO Elon Musk by no means had plans to pay lease on its places of work, in response to a brand new lawsuit.
The lawsuit, filed Tuesday in Delaware District Court, accuses Mr. Musk and Twitter of knowingly violating the regulation in the course of the takeover late final yr.
Some of essentially the most eye-catching particulars from the lawsuit embody accusations that Mr. Musk by no means deliberate to pay the lease on the corporate’s workplace area.
According to one of many plaintiffs, former Twitter worker Joseph Killian, Mr. Musk made the choice in December to cease paying lease. Mr. Killian heard of the choice secondhand from enterprise capitalist Pablo Mendoza, who was an investor in Mr. Musk’s Twitter acquisition.
“Kilian attempted to convince Musk, via Mendoza, of the danger of Musk’s new position that no rent would be paid whatsoever, pointing out that any attempt to renegotiate the terms of Twitter’s many leases would be doomed to failure,” the lawsuit reads.
But Mr. Killian says he was decided to not pay.
“Elon told me he would only pay the rent over his dead body,” Mr. Mendoza allegedly instructed Mr. Killian.
The lawsuit additionally factors to disparaging feedback Mr. Musk and his lawyer Alex Spiro made about San Francisco, the place Twitter’s headquarters are situated. According to the swimsuit, Mr. Spiro mentioned that it was unreasonable to ask Twitter to pay lease in a “sh**hole” like San Francisco. Mr. Musk has tweeted comparable disparaging feedback in regards to the metropolis.
The allegations could have severe penalties within the ongoing authorized battle between Twitter and its numerous landlords. The firm is at the moment battling lawsuits filed by its landlords in London, New York and San Francisco, all of that are looking for fee for unpaid lease.
Content Source: www.washingtontimes.com