Even Johns Hopkins University, dwelling of probably the most prestigious medical faculties within the nation, is having hassle deciding what a girl is.
The Baltimore college faraway from its web site its “LGBTQ Glossary” after being accused of erasing ladies over the glossary’s strained definition of the time period “lesbian” as a “non-man attracted to non-men.”
On Wednesday, the college was backpedaling.
“The LGBTQ Glossary serves as an introduction to the range of identities and terms that are used within LGBTQ communities, and is not intended to serve as the definitive answers as to how all people understand or use these terms,” mentioned the college in a assertion on its web site.
The college additionally mentioned the glossary didn’t undergo the right channels earlier than being posted on the Office of Diversity and Inclusion web page.
“While the glossary is a resource posted on the website of the Johns Hopkins University Office of Diversity and Inclusion (ODI); the definitions were not reviewed or approved by ODI leadership and the language in question has been removed pending review,” mentioned the assertion.
The college’s retreat got here after blowback from gender-ideology critics like “Harry Potter” creator J.Ok. Rowling, who famous that the definition of “gay man” included the phrase “man.”
“Man: no definition needed,” Ms. Rowling tweeted. “Non-man (formerly known as woman): a being definable only by reference to the male. An absence, a vacuum where there’s no man-ness.”
Man: no definition wanted.
Non-man (previously generally known as girl):
a being definable solely by reference to the male. An absence, a vacuum the place there’s no man-ness. pic.twitter.com/cpSaSR2Vfg
— J.Ok. Rowling (@jk_rowling) June 13, 2023
El Paso County [Colorado] Commissioner Stan VanderWerf tweeted: “John Hopkins! How can they be a research university if they cannot define what a woman is.”
Lesbian activist Arielle Scarcella requested: “Why is a lesbian a non-man but a gay person isn’t a non-woman? Progressive misogyny.”
Ben Shapiro, editor emeritus of the Daily Wire, quipped: “Lesbians are now officially squirrels.”
Johns Hopkins isn’t alone. The TikTok account for the It Gets Better Project, a gaggle aimed toward supporting LGBTQ youth, posted a video in April that seeks to clear up the definition of “lesbian.”
“There’s a misconception that ‘lesbian’ means ‘a woman who loves other women,’ and actually, the definition is ‘non-men who are attracted to and love other non-men,’” says the unidentified speaker within the video, which was flagged by Human Events.
“It’s interesting to see nowadays that there are some folks who try to gate-keep that identity and only include folks who identify as women, and that’s not what being lesbian is all about,” she says.
The effort to redefine “woman” to incorporate males who determine as ladies prompted a number of states to cross payments this 12 months that cite biologically based mostly definitions of “male” and “female” for functions of state regulation.
The payments signed into regulation in Kansas, Tennessee and Montana have been based mostly on the Women’s Bill of Rights, mannequin laws created final 12 months by the right-tilting Independent Women’s Voice and left-tilting Women’s Liberation Front.
Content Source: www.washingtontimes.com