Not even $12 million price of fines is sufficient to cease a Jersey Shore city from bulldozing sand on its seashore to bolster eroded spots in defiance of state environmental officers.
The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection says North Wildwood as soon as once more carried out unauthorized repairs to its eroding dunes, most lately on June 5 with out state approval and in violation of a February courtroom order imposed by a choose attempting to type out the decade-long sand storm between the 2 events.
On Thursday, DEP Commissioner Shawn LaTourette wrote to North Wildwood officers providing one last try and resolve the matter with out imposing further penalties, and warning that the town’s conduct jeopardizes funding for future seashore safety tasks.
Describing himself as “perplexed” by North Wildwood’s actions, LaTourette wrote that the town “has repeatedly engaged in destructive and illegal conduct in the name of tourism and, supposedly, public safety. This is wrongheaded and it must stop.”
Mayor Patrick Rosenello stated the state is accountable for failing to facilitate the identical form of authorities seashore replenishment venture in his metropolis that many of the remainder of the Jersey Shore has been receiving for many years.
“The DEP needs to spend more time doing the job of protecting the Jersey Shore and less time on threats and intimidation,” he stated. “If they would just do their job, none of this would have happened, and all of it goes away. Truly amazing.”
The metropolis lately erected indicators on the entrances to its seashores with images and telephone numbers of LaTourette and Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy, with a message saying, “These two individuals are directly responsible for the state’s inaction on replenishing North Wildwood’s beaches.”
North Wildwood seems unfazed by the state’s fines and threats of extra to return: It is suing the state for $21 million, to recoup what it says is the price of trucking sand in to its eroded seashores for a decade.
The standoff between the town – a first-rate trip vacation spot for Philadelphians – and the state facilities on the truth that North Wildwood has been final in line for seashore replenishment carried out by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, due partly to issue in gathering mandatory approvals from property homeowners. That long-sought venture is lastly shifting ahead, however received’t occur till a minimum of 2025.
Because of that, elements of the town’s seashores have grow to be badly eroded, prompting the town to behave by itself to shore up the dunes when it feels they’ve grow to be endangered – usually with out permission from the state.
The DEP says that every motion involving heavy tools shifting sand round has weakened and lowered the peak of the dunes, truly making issues worse whereas destroying pure crops and animal habitat.
The two events reached a short lived truce in late May when erosion created steep cliffs the place seashore entrances had been, a harmful situation simply earlier than the beginning of the Memorial Day vacation weekend. The state granted a one-time authorization to do emergency repairs to the beachfront on that event.
It didn’t approve the June 5 dune work, for which the town sought approval the subsequent day, after the work was just about accomplished. But Rosenello stated the town notified the DEP prematurely of what it deliberate to do on the seashore.
He additionally stated the town thought-about the erosion previous the June 5 work to be an extension of the identical drawback that led to the state granting emergency authorization in May. Therefore, he stated, the town was justified in fixing the dunes once more.
“It was the exact same work in the exact same place,” he stated. “There’s so little of this dune left that we don’t need a direct hit from a hurricane for it to be completely gone.”
LaTourette stated the DEP “has been willing to resolve millions in penalties owed by the city for its repeated illegal and environmentally destructive activities.”
But he stated North Wildwood should “immediately cease and desist from this pattern and practice of violating the law. You are placing the public safety, environment, and the city’s access to continued financial support for shore protection at risk.”
Content Source: www.washingtontimes.com