Federal prosecutors late Friday requested the decide overseeing former President Trump‘s election case to bar him from publicly disclosing among the proof gathered towards him, saying a current social media submit may have “a harmful chilling effect on witnesses.”
In a court docket submitting simply earlier than midnight, prosecutors urged U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan to impose strict guidelines barring Mr. Trump from discussing particulars concerning the case whereas his authorized crew opinions supplies in the course of the discovery course of.
The submitting cites a submit by Mr. Trump on his Truth Social web page Friday warning, “IF YOU GO AFTER ME, I’M COMING AFTER YOU!”
“Such a restriction is particularly important in this case because the defendant has previously issued public statements on social media, regarding witnesses, judges, attorneys and others associated with legal matters pending against him,” the prosecutors wrote.
Protective orders are comparatively widespread in prison circumstances, however prosecutors mentioned it was “particularly important” within the Jan. 6 case due to Mr. Trump‘s historical past of posting on social media.
Mr. Trump was arraigned Thursday in Washington on fees that included conspiracy to defraud the United States and depriving residents of their rights. He has pleaded not responsible and dismissed the allegations towards him of “political interference” aimed toward undermining his 2024 presidential marketing campaign.
Prosecutors mentioned that Mr. Trump had written “multiple posts” that talked about or implied the case, together with the one cited of their filings.
They warned Mr. Trump may disclose grand jury transcripts or different proof obtained in discovery, which “could have a harmful chilling effect on witnesses or adversely affect the fair administration of justice in this case.”
“All the proposed order seeks to prevent is the improper dissemination or use of discovery materials including to the public,” prosecutors wrote. “Such a restriction is particularly important in this case because the defendant has previously issued public statements on social media regarding witnesses, judges, attorneys, and others associated with legal matters pending against him.”
A Trump spokesperson early Saturday pushed again on the submitting, saying the submit cited by prosecutors is “the definition of political speech” and “was in response to the RINO, China-loving, dishonest special interest groups and Super PACs.”
Mr. Trump‘s legal team will likely respond to the proposed protective order with a legal brief of their own, but it’s unclear when that will likely be filed.
During Thursday’s court docket listening to, U.S. Magistrate Judge Moxila Upadhyaya issued a warning to Mr. Trump that isn’t sometimes given to defendants at arraignments.
“I want to remind you that it is a crime to try to influence a juror, or to threaten or attempt to bribe a witness or any other person who may have information about your case, or to retaliate against anyone for providing information about your case to the prosecution, or to otherwise obstruct the administration of justice,” she mentioned.
If Judge Chutkan does problem the protecting order, she received’t be the primary to take action this summer time. In June, a federal decide issued a protecting order barring Mr. Trump from disclosing on social media proof the federal government has amassed towards him in a separate case accusing him of illegally retaining labeled authorities paperwork.
A protecting order was additionally issued within the New York case, the place prosecutors say Mr. Trump falsified enterprise data to cowl up hush cash funds to 2 girls who alleged affairs with him forward of the 2016 election.
The subsequent listening to within the election case is about for August 28.
Content Source: www.washingtontimes.com