Former Attorney General William Barr prepared to testify towards Trump in Jan. 6 legal case

Former Attorney General William Barr prepared to testify towards Trump in Jan. 6 legal case

Former Attorney General William P. Barr mentioned Sunday he’s prepared to testify towards former President Donald Trump at a trial over his ex-boss’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

Once a detailed ally to Mr. Trump, Mr. Barr refused to say whether or not he appeared as a grand jury witness earlier than final week’s indictment of the ex-president however mentioned “of course” when requested if he would testify in the course of the trial. 

“I go through that in my book in painstaking detail, but on three occasions, at least, and I told him in no uncertain terms, that there was no evidence of fraud that would have changed the outcome,” he mentioned on CBS’ “Face the Nation.” 



Former Vice President Mike Pence confirmed Sunday he testified to the grand jury after being subpoenaed however mentioned he has no plans to take action within the trial. 

The newest costs marked the third legal case towards the 2024 Republican presidential candidate. The different circumstances embody one in Florida for allegedly mishandling categorized paperwork at his Mar-a-Lago property after leaving workplace and one in New York for alleged marketing campaign finance violations associated to hush-money funds earlier than the 2016 election. 

Mr. Barr resigned from his publish following the 2020 election amid Mr. Trump’s repeated efforts to overturn the outcomes and his unsubstantiated claims of widespread voter fraud. 


SEE ALSO: Pence says he testified to Jan. 6 grand jury towards Trump however no plans to take action in trial


“I think it satisfied us that there was no basis for concluding that there had been fraud in those instances. Some of them are obvious. One that he keeps on repeating is that there were more people voted then absentee ballots that were requested, and that was mixing apples and oranges,” Mr. Barr mentioned. “Once that was explained to him, we should have heard no more about that.”

Content Source: www.washingtontimes.com