Thursday, October 24

Wisconsin Supreme Court chief justice accuses liberal majority of staging ‘coup’

MADISON, Wis. — The conservative chief justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court on Monday instructed the brand new liberal majority in a scathing electronic mail that they’d staged a “coup” and carried out an “illegal experiment” once they voted to weaken her powers and fireplace the director of state courts.

Chief Justice Annette Ziegler, in two emails obtained by The Associated Press, stated that firing and hiring a brand new state courtroom director was unlawful and ordered interim state courtroom director Audrey Skwierawski to cease signing orders with out her information or approval.

“You are making a mess of the judiciary, the court and the institution for years to come,” Ziegler wrote to her fellow justices and Skwierawski. “This must stop. … I have no confidence in the recent hostile takeover and the chaotic effect it has had on the court, staff, and the overall stable functioning of the courts.”



Liberals gained a 4-3 majority on Aug. 1 when Justice Janet Protasiewicz started her 10-year time period after successful election in April. Conservatives had held the bulk for 15 years previous to that. The emails are the newest signal of broiling tensions on the courtroom since liberals took management.

In their first week in energy, the liberal justices voted to fireplace the state courtroom director, rent Skwierawski and create a committee to do a lot of the work that the chief justice had executed, a transfer that considerably weakened Ziegler. She was elected by the conservative majority to a second three-year time period as chief justice in May.

On Monday, Ziegler despatched Skwierawski an electronic mail telling her to cease signing orders below her identify.

“It has come to my attention that you have been signing my reserve judge orders without my knowledge or approval,” Ziegler wrote within the electronic mail. “You never asked me for permission. You do not have my permission. Stop. These orders are in my name. You have no lawful authority to sign them. If you have signed anything else under my name, please advise immediately.”

Skwierawski didn’t reply to a request for remark through electronic mail.

Ziegler additionally didn’t reply to an electronic mail asking her if she was going to rescind the orders assigning reserve judges to listen to instances, or signal them herself so the judges might stay on the instances.

Ziegler additionally despatched a scathing electronic mail to the entire justices as soon as once more accusing liberals of appearing illegally, inflicting hurt to the courtroom’s inside operations and public notion. Ziegler refused to schedule weekly conferences with what she referred to as the “invented committee” created by the liberal justices.

“I am not willing to violate my oath or the constitution,” she wrote. “You know that this invented ‘committee’ is in violation of your oath, the constitution and longstanding court practice. It is illegitimate and unenforceable.”

A request for remark from the four-justice liberal majority, left with Supreme Court spokesperson Tom Sheehan, was not returned.

Ziegler additionally repeated her declare, made when Skwierawski was employed, that the assembly to fireplace her predecessor was unlawful and that she can’t maintain the place as a result of she is an elected Milwaukee County circuit choose. Skwierawski is on a depart of absence to take the courtroom director job.

“Judge Skwieraski has not stopped being a circuit court judge and there is absolutely no provision that allows her to take a leave (not resign) and be paid more money for a different position,” Ziegler wrote. “She cannot serve two positions at once. Her purported appointment as interim director of state courts raises serious concerns about this being a public trust violation.”

Ziegler stated she would promote nationally for a brand new director of state courts.

She additionally stated the committee created by the liberal justices is unconstitutional.

“Again, I will not condone such lawless destruction of the constitution, the judiciary, or the court,” Ziegler wrote. “For 40 years, the role of the Chief Justice has been understood and respected. Your short term goals will cause long term, irreparable damage to the judiciary. What a historical disgrace.”

Copyright © 2023 The Washington Times, LLC.

Content Source: www.washingtontimes.com