Andrew Bailey has known as into query whether or not UK banks have massive sufficient money buffers to deal with crises just like the latest run on Silicon Valley Bank.
The Governor of the Bank of England (BoE) mentioned final month’s turmoil, which led to the fast takeovers of the financial institution’s US and UK arms, served as a warning that rushes to withdraw deposits can now go “further much more quickly” because of on-line know-how.
The collapse of the financial institution sparked jitters throughout the globe, with UBS stepping in to avoid wasting its Swiss rival Credit Suisse, whereas financial institution shares additionally slid, earlier than markets later calmed.
Speaking at an occasion in Washington DC, Mr Bailey cautioned: “We can’t assume that, going forwards, the current answer on the total size of liquidity protection is the correct one.
“We noticed with Silicon Valley Bank that with the know-how now we have as we speak – each when it comes to communication and velocity of entry to checking account – runs can go additional far more rapidly.
“This must beg the question of what are appropriate and desired liquidity buffers that create the time needed to take action to solve the problem.”
But he additionally reaffirmed his conviction that reforms launched after the 2008 monetary disaster had “worked”, including: “I do not believe we face a systemic banking crisis.”
“When I look at the UK banks, they are well capitalised, liquid and able to serve their customers and support the economy,” he added.
Read extra from enterprise:
Lowest demand for money since banks hoarded notes over millennium bug
Rise in job candidates ‘suggests tide could possibly be turning’ in labour market
World economic system coming into ‘perilous part’, IMF says
Mr Bailey acknowledged that requiring banks to carry bigger buffers risked having an affect on financial progress.
He advised his viewers on the Institute of International Finance: “A common outcome of… increasing the broader liquidity buffers of banks and non-banks could be to create a constraint on lending and investment in the real economy.
“For the UK economic system this may go in opposition to the necessity to finance funding to assist stronger potential progress, from its present weak degree.”
And the governor said banks and non-banking financial institutions could not be expected to hold ever larger liquidity buffers to cover unforeseeable ‘Black Swan’ events, and said it was preferable for central banks to have tools to act with “non permanent and focused interventions”.
Listen and subscribe to The Ian King Business Podcast here.
Lessons to be learnt
Mr Bailey’s comments on online technology come after his deputy Sam Woods told MPs on the Treasury Committee last month that banks needed to consider how easily deposits can be withdrawn electronically in seconds.
The governor later told a separate event, hosted by the International Monetary Fund, that he believed lessons could still be learnt from the recent turmoil – despite his insistence that there were no systemic issues – such as how to adapt to the speed and ease with which deposits could now be withdrawn.
“There are studying factors from these points that now we have run into,” he told an audience in Washington DC. “We can have to spend so much of time pondering this stuff by.”
Mr Bailey also reiterated he did not see the makings of another 2008 financial crisis as “the system is in a way more strong situation”. And he added: “we have much more instruments within the armoury 1681339041”.
Content Source: information.sky.com