Tuesday, October 22

Horse Hill court docket battle may set precedent that triggers ‘starting of the tip’ of latest fossil gasoline initiatives in UK

The firm behind a controversial coal mine in West Cumbria and the UK atmosphere regulator are each intervening in a separate court docket battle over plans to pump oil within the Surrey countryside.

Next month’s Supreme Court case about whether or not to extract about three million tonnes of oil from Horse Hill is considered a take a look at case that would carry the “beginning of the end” of latest fossil gasoline manufacturing within the UK.

The web site, close to Gatwick, was first accredited by Surrey County Council in 2019 however has confronted a authorized problem by campaigners ever since, and can subsequent month go earlier than the UK’s highest court docket.

Unusually, the Supreme Court has permitted 4 further our bodies to intervene – that means they’ll make written or oral submissions to help the court docket’s understanding, reflecting the general public significance of the case.

Aerial view Horse Hill oil site in Surrey, near Gatwick
Image:
If accredited, Horse Hill would extract oil from six wells over 25 years

One of these weighing in is West Cumbria Mining, whose plan to develop the UK’s first new coal mine in 30 years in Whitehaven was controversially accredited by the federal government in December.

WCM didn’t reply to a request to touch upon why it had intervened.

But if the campaigner’s enchantment in opposition to the Surrey oil web site wins subsequent month, it could possibly be “that you have to completely reassess whether that coal mine in Cumbria can happen at all”, based on barrister Sam Fowles.

“It is extremely difficult to overstate the significance of this case,” mentioned Mr Fowles, who specialises in planning and atmosphere legislation at Cornerstone Barristers.

It has the potential set off the “beginning of the end of … new fossil fuel extraction in the UK going forward”, he added.

The authorities is because of decide imminently on the large Rosebank oil and gasoline subject within the North Sea.

Charles McAllister, director of business group UK Onshore Oil and Gas, known as it “incontrovertible” that the UK wants some oil and gasoline past 2050, “even with huge growth in renewables”.

“It’s a case of where we got it from, not if we need or not.”

Read extra:
Power large Drax instructed by personal advisers to cease calling biomass ‘carbon impartial’
UK vulnerable to falling behind in race to change into inexperienced hydrogen world chief, main agency says
East Africa drought wouldn’t have occurred with out people, scientists conclude

Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant

Setting the agenda for COP28

‘Clear ramifications’ for future initiatives

Both the Cumbria coal mine and the Surrey oil case hinge on the identical thorny situation plaguing planning authorities presiding over fossil gasoline initiatives.

The query is whether or not their assessments of the undertaking’s harm to the atmosphere need to think about solely the emissions from getting the fossil gasoline out of the bottom, or additionally from when it is used or burned later “downstream”.

These are generally known as “scope 3” emissions and have a tendency to make up nearly all of a undertaking’s or firm’s greenhouse gases. Fossil fuels are the primary reason for local weather change, which is already threatening the UK through issues like rising sea ranges and final summer time’s intense drought.

Both the Cumbria coal mine and the Horse Hill oil web site had been accredited partly on the premise that these “downstream” emissions needn’t be taken into consideration, and due to this fact total emissions could be low.

Sarah Finch, the lead campaigner difficult the oil choice, instructed Sky News: “More than 10 million tonnes of carbon dioxide could be released when the oil from Horse Hill is ultimately burned.”

Katie de Kauwe, a lawyer at campaigning group Friends of the Earth, which can also be intervening, mentioned: “It can’t be right that the biggest impacts of fossil fuel projects on people and our planet can effectively be left out when planning decisions are made.

“This is a massively consequential authorized problem that would have clear ramifications for different fossil gasoline developments, together with the brand new coal mine deliberate in West Cumbria and the legality of the Secretary of State’s choice to approve it.

“West Cumbria Mining is clearly concerned, which is why they’re intervening.”

Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant

Protesters disrupt Barclays assembly

Ms Finch’s preliminary problem within the High Court was thrown out. But she took it to the following court docket, the Court of Appeal, the place the three judges had been cut up, with one agreeing she had a degree however the majority saying it was a matter for planning authorities moderately than the court docket.

But that creates an enormous drawback, based on the Office for Environmental Protection (OEP) – the UK atmosphere watchdog arrange after Brexit in 2021 – which is, for the primary time, intervening in a Supreme Court case.

“It means that local planning authorities could reach entirely different conclusions on an important issue of principle on essentially the same facts,” it mentioned in its submission to the court docket, leaving the legislation “in an unpredictable state with potentially capricious results”.

Extinction Rebellion activists hold banners as they stage a protest at the Horse Hill oilfield, partly owned by the British energy company UK Oil & Gas, in Surrey, Britain, June 1, 2020. Steve Ringham/Jono/Extinction Rebellion South East/via REUTERS. THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY.
Image:
Horse Hill has been challenged by campaigners because it was first accredited in 2019

‘Not clear-cut’ if UK ought to pump extra oil and gasoline – local weather advisers

“If it is successful, which I don’t think it will be, it will set a precedent,” mentioned Charles McAllister from UKOOG.

If the campaigners win, it could have “far-reaching implications beyond the onshore oil and gas industry, ranging from the offshore oil and gas industry, mining, metals, manufacturing, aviation”, he warned.

The Horse Hill web site would extract round 200,000 barrels of oil over 25 years, which could possibly be used to energy jets, create electrical energy or warmth houses. The UK produces about a million barrels of oil a day.

Charles McAllister from UK Onshore Oil and Gas
Image:
UK Onshore Oil and Gas says its greener to extract oil at house

Independent authorities local weather advisers from the CCC have mentioned the UK will want some oil till 2050, although it’s “not clear-cut” whether or not it ought to produce extra domestically.

The International Energy Agency has mentioned no new fossil gasoline undertaking is suitable with the globally accepted purpose of limiting warming to 1.5C.

UK Oil and Gas, the primary builders of Horse Hill, declined to remark.

A spokesperson for Surrey County Council mentioned it’s “required to determine planning applications in accordance with the Development Plan, the National Planning Policy Framework, national policy and other material considerations, as set out in legislation and case law.

“The County Council will current its case to the Supreme Court, which is able to situation a choice in the end.”

Watch The Climate Show with Tom Heap on Saturday and Sunday at 3pm and seven.30pm on Sky News, on the Sky News web site and app, and on YouTube and Twitter.

The present investigates how world warming is altering our panorama and highlights options to the disaster.

Content Source: information.sky.com