Vision Solar accused of deceiving clients, faces multistate lawsuit
A New Jersey photo voltaic panel set up firm, Vision Solar, is going through a class-action lawsuit filed Monday by 18 plaintiffs from Arizona, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Connecticut, Florida and Pennsylvania.
The plaintiffs contend that Vision Solar misled them about quite a few points of their photo voltaic panel installations, together with the advantages of the panels, the eligibility of house owners for tax credit, financing for the panels and general efficiency.
The swimsuit requests a transfer to a jury trial in addition to damages paid to the plaintiffs.
“The company cares about its own profits and revenue above all else. Their attitude is once the panels are on your roof, they’re your problem, not theirs,” Ian Sloss, a lawyer with the Connecticut legislation agency Silver Golub & Teitell representing plaintiffs, informed WPEC, a West Palm Beach, Florida, CBS affiliate.
Vision Solar’s mortgage companions, Sunlight Financial and Technology Credit Union, are additionally being investigated, in accordance with Silver Golub & Teitell.
Adding to Vision Solar’s troubles was a lawsuit filed by Connecticut Attorney General William Tong on March 16.
“Vision Solar’s predatory practices are far and away the worst we have seen. Vision Solar preyed on low-income, elderly and disabled homeowners, pressuring them into unaffordable loans for solar panels that in some cases were never activated,” Mr. Tong mentioned in an announcement.
Vision Solar started providing its companies to clients in December 2020. Mr. Tong’s workplace has acquired 14 complaints concerning the corporate since August 2021.
Vision Solar has not responded to a request for remark from The Washington Times.
In an announcement to WPEC, Vision Solar Chief Marketing Officer Bennett Andelman mentioned, “Not discussed in this class-action lawsuit is the fact that we have completed or have made significant progress on the majority of the projects associated with these customers indicated in the suit. We will continue to work with each of them, and anyone else, who files a claim until their projects are fully operational and they are satisfied or through their request for cancellation.”
Content Source: www.washingtontimes.com