The White House has lengthy used a stalled fossil gas pipeline as a bargaining chip with Republicans within the administration’s efforts to draw GOP help for supercharging renewables by accelerating the nation’s power allowing legal guidelines.
But the Mountain Valley Pipeline can not be leveraged by President Biden, due to the $6.6 billion natural-gas undertaking’s approval getting tucked into the deal reached by Mr. Biden and Speaker Kevin McCarthy to droop the debt ceiling till January 2025.
The inclusion of the greater than 300-mile-long enterprise that winds by way of rural Virginia and West Virginia has Democrats fuming and Republicans touting what they are saying is a strategic benefit that may tip future power talks about streamlining tasks of their favor.
“When the White House put this on the table, there was a lot of discussion on our side thinking about it strategically,” mentioned Louisiana Rep. Garret Graves, a key GOP negotiator in debt-limit talks. “It now is going to be putting Democrats on record supporting judicial limitations on conventional energy projects.”
In addition to the pipeline, Republicans secured cut-off dates for environmental critiques that may velocity up proposed power tasks, particularly fossil fuels, providing the GOP a transparent victory on allowing.
Fast-tracking the nation’s allowing guidelines is an important a part of Mr. Biden’s inexperienced agenda. However, the electrical energy transmission element for renewables stays a significant sticking level between the 2 events.
Mr. Graves mentioned taking the Mountain Valley Pipeline “off the table was ultimately a strategic win for Republicans” and akin to “taking away a carrot that is going to continue to be offered” to influential lawmakers on power coverage, citing West Virginia Sens. Joe Manchin III, a Democrat, and Shelley Moore Capito, a Republican.
The place marked a reversal for House Republicans, who beforehand opposed singling out particular power tasks.
“It makes it much harder to get somebody like Capito [on future permitting], and I can understand why progressives are pissed about it,” a Democratic aide advised The Washington Times.
Ms. Capito, rating member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, and her GOP colleagues don’t see it that means.
“I don’t know how that logic goes,” Ms. Capito advised The Times. “I’m still really ready and willing to look at a broader permitting bill, definitely. Through regular order, through the committees.”
Sen. Bill Cassidy, Louisiana Republican on the Senate Energy Committee, mentioned the inclusion of the Mountain Valley Pipeline “was more for Manchin than it was anybody else.”
Mr. Manchin, who chairs the Senate Energy Committee, has for the previous yr looked for Congress and the administration to log off on the undertaking after years of delay by court docket rulings. He continues to be advocating for broader allowing laws.
“I think the bottom line is we’re all determined to get [permitting] done,” he mentioned. “We’ve got to for the sake of our country.”
NextEra Energy, one of many corporations behind the Mountain Valley Pipeline, has contributed closely in recent times to the campaigns of Mr. Manchin and Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer, New York Democrat. In the 2022 cycle, Mr. Manchin obtained $60,350 and Mr. Schumer obtained $302,600 from NextEra’s staff and political motion committee, in response to the marketing campaign finance watchdog OpenSecrets.
Other Democrats, in the meantime, are nonetheless crossing their fingers they will win over Republicans on clear power parts of allowing after the GOP’s wins within the debt-limit invoice.
“We have to make our own case on transmission and permitting going forward. We can’t hold back one thing or another to try to have a carrot when we need it,” mentioned Colorado Democratic Sen. John Hickenlooper. “I think we’ve got to make the persuasive argument: Here’s the rate of extreme weather. Here’s what that’s costing us as a country… And here’s how much we can mitigate that by investing in regional transmission lines.”
Content Source: www.washingtontimes.com