Speaker clinging on to job as 33 MPs signal no-confidence movement after Commons Gaza vote descends into row

Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle has apologised to MPs after the chamber descended into chaos round a movement calling for a ceasefire in Gaza.

Wednesday was designated as an opposition day for the SNP, which selected to debate the Israel-Hamas warfare – and sought to influence MPs to again its requires a right away halt to the combating.

But a controversial choice from Sir Lindsay to permit a Labour modification to be put to the House led to an uproar from Tory MPs – and finally noticed the federal government pledging to “play no further part” in proceedings, in addition to the SNP not even attending to vote on its authentic proposal.

After Conservative and SNP politicians stormed out of the chamber in protest, Sir Lindsay returned to the Commons to face his critics, apologising for “how it all ended up” and saying he took “responsibility” for his actions.

But SNP chief Stephen Flynn mentioned he would “take significant convincing” that the Speaker’s place was “not now intolerable”.

And 33 MPs from each his social gathering and the Tories have now signed a no-confidence movement in Sir Lindsay – not sufficient to oust him but, however a movement that might acquire traction within the coming days.

Politics stay: Speaker sparks fury with amendments choice

Today’s debate was set to be the conclusion of days of drama over whether or not Labour would change its place on the battle within the Middle East.

The social gathering initially supported the federal government’s stance, calling for a pause within the combating quite than a ceasefire, because it didn’t consider the latter can be sustainable.

However, after the SNP determined to drive the problem to a vote within the Commons, Labour went additional – placing ahead an modification calling as an alternative for an “immediate humanitarian ceasefire”, albeit nonetheless with its preliminary caveats that each side would wish to put down their arms and Israeli hostages must be launched.

Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge

Sky News Monday to Thursday at 7pm.
Watch stay on Sky channel 501, Freeview 233, Virgin 602, the Sky News web site and app or YouTube.

Tap right here for extra

A contemporary row erupted on Wednesday after Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle broke with conference to place Labour’s modification to a vote – as opposition events can not often amend opposition motions, solely the federal government.

Labour sources advised Sky News Sir Lindsay – who was a Labour MP earlier than taking up the function of Speaker – had been pressured by social gathering whips to pick out it, however a celebration spokesman denied the declare.

However, Tory MPs accused him of creating an “overtly political decision” to pick out the modification as a way to stop Sir Keir Starmer dealing with a insurrection from his backbenchers – who may have supported the SNP’s movement and not using a Labour choice.

In a shock transfer, Leader of the House Penny Mordaunt introduced the federal government can be withdrawing its personal modification to the SNP’s movement – which reiterated the federal government’s current place – saying the Conservatives would “play no further part in the decision this House takes on today’s proceedings”.

She mentioned the choice of Sir Lindsay to pick out the Labour modification had “undermined the confidence” of MPs in procedures, “raised temperatures in this House on an issue where feelings are already running high” and “put honourable and right honourable members in a more difficult position”.

But on account of parliamentary guidelines, the choice to stroll away meant Labour’s modification handed and MPs may solely vote on the altered movement – stopping the SNP’s authentic proposal even being voted on.

Instead of the aftermath being concerning the significance of the UK parliament formally backing a right away ceasefire in Gaza for the primary time, the main focus returned to the influence of Sir Lindsay’s earlier choices – with some Tory and SNP MPs leaving the chamber in protest.

The SNP’s Mr Flynn referred to as for the Speaker to return to the Commons, asking deputy speaker Dame Rosie Winterton: “How do we bring him to this House now to explain to the Scottish National Party why our views and our votes in this House are irrelevant to him?”

And after some delaying ways by MPs, the Speaker appeared to supply his apologies to MPs on all sides.

As some MPs referred to as out “resign”, Sir Lindsay reiterated his earlier justifications for choosing the Labour modification, saying he had been attempting to make sure all choices had been on the desk for MPs to vote on – in addition to defending MPs’ security.

He added: “I thought I was doing the right thing and the best thing, and I regret it, and I apologise for how it’s ended up.

“I do take accountability for my actions.”

But while Mr Flynn accepted the intention of the apology, he said the result of the Speaker’s actions saw “an SNP opposition day flip right into a Labour Party opposition day”.

“I’m afraid that’s treating myself and my colleagues within the Scottish National Party with full and utter contempt,” he said.

“I’ll take vital convincing that your place is just not now insupportable.”

Speaking to Sky News after the drama had unfolded, Mr Flynn apologised to the general public, saying immediately ought to have been about Palestinians in Gaza.

“But Westminster does this, doesn’t it?” he added. “It turns into a [debate] all about Westminster and what a circus this is.

“Because because of the actions of the Speaker of the House of Commons, the SNP has been stitched as much as the purpose that the Labour Party had been the one sport on the town immediately.”

He said there would be some “severe recriminations”, adding: “Today was about one thing a lot greater than Westminster, and but right here we’re debating Westminster is nonsense.”

Labour’s shadow defence secretary, John Healey, defended Sir Lindsay, telling Sky News’s Politics Hub With Sophy Ridge: “The Speaker is there to protect the rights of all MPs and he was trying to do the right thing.

“He was attempting to verify [there was] the widest doable debate as a result of he is aware of it issues in parliament, it issues in our communities and it issues past the shores of Britain.”

However, Mr Healey criticised other MPs, adding: “This was an opportunity after we may have proven the most effective of parliament in coming collectively to demand an finish to the combating in Gaza.

“But instead we’ve revealed the worst of Westminster, with this descending into a row about procedure, with a boycott from the Conservatives, a walkout from the SNP, and frankly, this does nothing to help the Palestinians and it does nothing to advance the cause of peace.”