Tuesday, October 22

House panel to carry Secretary of State Antony Blinken in contempt of Congress

A House committee will vote as quickly as subsequent week to carry Secretary of State Antony Blinken in legal contempt of Congress for refusing to show over paperwork associated to the Biden administration’s abrupt U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan almost two years in the past. 

House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Michael McCaul confirmed the vote timing to The Washington Times. 

The Texas Republican disclosed his plans after Mr. Blinken refused to adjust to a subpoena that set a May 11 deadline to show over a dissent cable outlining considerations amongst U.S. diplomats from the embassy in Kabul forward of the pullout.

Dissent cables are usually categorized and Mr. Blinken instructed the committee in March he would by no means launch it as a result of doing so would injury the integrity of vital communications between the division and diplomats. 

State Department officers briefed Mr. McCaul in April on the paperwork he’s in search of however won’t hand them over. 

House Republicans, who took the bulk in January and now have subpoena energy, intensified their quest for info main as much as the chaotic August 2021 withdrawal that led to the deaths of 13 servicemen and girls and left hundreds of Americans behind along with tens of millions of {dollars} value of navy gear.

President Biden has largely blamed his predecessor, former President Donald Trump, for organising the circumstances that led to the botched pullout.

If the GOP-led panel votes to carry Mr. Blinken in contempt, the matter strikes to the House ground, the place a easy majority is required to move it. If Mr. Blinken is present in legal contempt of Congress, it will likely be as much as Mr. Biden’s Justice Department to pursue prices, which is uncertain. A courtroom, nonetheless, will in the end resolve whether or not Mr. Blinken should flip over the paperwork or in any other case accommodate Mr. McCaul’s subpoena, however that might take years. 

Content Source: www.washingtontimes.com