The district lawyer and the lawyer prosecuting Donald Trump for allegedly attempting to overturn his 2020 election defeat in Georgia have taken the witness stand - denying claims their romantic relationship presents a monetary battle of curiosity.

Trump and a few of his 14 co-defendants argue Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis must be disqualified from the prosecution as a result of her relationship with lawyer Nathan Wade.

The pair went on journeys collectively - with Mr Wade reserving them whereas he was being paid by Ms Willis' workplace.

Taking the witness stand, Ms Willis angrily pushed again towards what she described as "lies" about her relationship with Mr Wade.

She mentioned: "Do you think I'm on trial? These people are on trial for trying to steal an election in 2020. I'm not on trial no matter how hard you try to put me on trial."

Ashleigh Merchant, an lawyer representing Trump co-defendant Michael Roman, requested Ms Willis about the place the cash got here from that she gave to Mr Wade to reimburse him for journey.

"I am sure that the source of the money is always the work, sweat and tears of me," Ms Willis mentioned.

In response to questions by Ms Merchant, Ms Willis mentioned that she and Mr Wade by no means lived collectively regardless of court docket filings that have been submitted that said in any other case.

"It's certainly a lie that he lived with me," Ms Willis mentioned.

If the district lawyer have been to be disqualified, it may result in a brand new district lawyer being appointed who may both proceed with the costs towards Trump and his co-defendants or drop the case altogether.

Since the allegations of an inappropriate relationship surfaced, Trump has used them to attempt to forged doubt on the legitimacy of Ms Willis' case towards him.

Other Republicans have known as for an investigation into the district lawyer, a Democrat who's up for re-election this yr.

'She demanded to pay her personal manner'

During private and uncomfortable testimony that spanned hours, Mr Wade admitted to having intercourse with Ms Willis throughout his separation from his estranged spouse.

"There is nothing secret or salacious about having a private life," he mentioned. "Nothing."

Mr Wade has testified that he booked journeys with Ms Willis to California, Belize and Aruba whereas working for her workplace.

However, he maintains Ms Willis both reimbursed him in money or lined different bills.

"She was very emphatic and adamant about this independent, strong woman thing so she demanded that she paid her own way," Mr Wade mentioned.

Mr Wade mentioned the connection ended final summer time, however that he stays good pals with Ms Willis. He added that they have been "probably closer than ever because of these attacks".

Ms Merchant has described the connection as a battle of curiosity that ought to disqualify Ms Willis - and her total workplace - from the case.

She claims Ms Willis personally profited from the connection, paying Mr Wade greater than $650,000 (£516,000) for his work after which benefiting when he used his earnings to pay for the journeys they went on collectively.

Friend's proof questions when relationship began

Meanwhile, Robin Yeartie, a former buddy and worker of Ms Willis, contradicted the timeline of the connection the lawyer and the district lawyer have offered to the court docket.

Mr Yeartie testified that Mr Wade and Ms Willis started courting shortly after they met in 2019 and earlier than the lawyer was contracted to guide the Trump case.

Mr Wade and Ms Willis have testified that the connection started in early 2022.

The listening to, which is able to proceed on Friday, will decide whether or not Ms Willis' workplace must be disqualified from prosecuting the election case.

Read extra:Trump asks Supreme Court to delay election caseHow Trump blocked Ukraine help - to assist bid to beat BidenTrump criticised for feedback that 'put troopers in danger'

Claims dismissed as 'fantastical hypothesis'

The district lawyer's workplace has blasted the disqualification effort as a publicity stunt primarily based on "fantastical theories and rank speculation".

In a court docket submitting earlier this month, Ms Willis' workplace insisted that she has no monetary or private battle of curiosity and that there are not any grounds to dismiss the case or to take away her from the prosecution.

The Georgia case is one in every of 4 legal prosecutions that Trump is dealing with as he closes in on securing the Republican nomination to problem Democratic President Joe Biden within the November election.

Trump has lengthy offered the Georgia prosecution, and others he faces, as politically motivated makes an attempt to stop him from returning to energy.

He has highlighted the claims towards Ms Willis as proof of perceived misconduct by these pursuing him.

Trump was in New York on Thursday the place a choose scheduled a trial on prices associated to hush-money funds to a porn star to start out on 25 March.

Content Source: information.sky.com