A Dutch court docket banned a person Friday from donating any extra of his sperm after his donations led to the siring of 550 to 600 kids.

Jonathan Meijer, 41, lied to potential recipients of his sperm about how a lot he had already donated, understanding that his donation historical past was key within the selections mother and father made about which sperm donor to make use of.

In the Netherlands, the authorized restrict is 25 kids born to 12 moms. Mr. Meijer, who started donating in 2007, donated to no less than 11 Dutch clinics. He was banned from donating sperm within the Netherlands after it got here out that he had fathered 102 children.

From 2015 to 2018, Mr. Meijer used Danish sperm financial institution Cryos, which doesn't have a restrict and which sends semen to non-public addresses internationally.

Mr. Meijer additionally used a Ukrainian financial institution, BioTexCom Center for Human Reproduction, and organized non-public residence insemination through social media, in line with Dutch court docket paperwork.

Mr. Meijer’s brood swelled fourfold to 550-600 children.

The swimsuit was filed by the Stitchting Donorkind, a company representing a number of households that had kids utilizing Mr. Meijer’s materials.

The group and different plaintiffs argued that the danger of unintentional incest, in addition to the psychosocial features of getting so many different half-siblings on Mr. Meijer’s current kids, was too nice to permit Mr. Meijer to donate any extra sperm.

Ultimately, a choose at The Hague District Court dominated that the rights of the mother and father and kids to privateness outweighed Mr. Meijer’s proper to freely donate his sperm.

Mr. Meijer has seven days to reveal whether or not or not he had donated to extra clinics. If he's discovered to have donated sperm sooner or later, he must pay $110,000 per case.

The $110,000 advantageous will even apply if Mr. Meijer is discovered to have engaged in communication with potential mother and father or posted commercials about donating his sperm sooner or later.

As for sperm Mr. Meijer donated that has not been used, the choose additionally required him to ship these services a letter asking that his samples be destroyed, other than these reserved for fogeys which have used his materials beforehand.

A mom and plaintiff within the case applauded the ruling, hoping that it served to dampen the genetic ambitions of potential mass donors going ahead.

“I hope that this ruling leads to a ban on mass donation and spreads like an oil slick to other countries. We must stand hand in hand around our children and protect them against this injustice,” the mom, Eva, advised the Associated Press in a press release. She didn't present a surname.

Content Source: www.washingtontimes.com