NEW YORK — Days after Fox News agreed to pay practically $800 million to settle a lawsuit over its airing of 2020 election lies, you’d be hard-pressed to note something had modified there.

Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham led their exhibits Thursday speaking about Hunter Biden, the president’s son. Ingraham’s present warned, “The left wants the government to be your only family.” Hannity focused acquainted villains - Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and Vice President Kamala Harris. Carlson mocked a speech on racial fairness, saying it meant “that straight white men are bad.”

Experts doubt the settlement will result in a lot of a course correction in conservative media, save for rather less specificity to keep away from future lawsuits.

So far, that’s been the chief results of a Connecticut jury’s verdict final 12 months that Alex Jones should pay $965 million to folks of Sandy Hook faculty taking pictures victims, after claiming the 2012 bloodbath was a hoax and that grieving mother and father had been actors. Now Jones is extra more likely to hold names out of it, mentioned Nicole Hemmer, a Vanderbilt University professor and creator of “Partisans: The Conservative Revolutionaries Who Remade American Politics in the 1990s.”

“It hasn’t changed his conspiracy theories,” Hemmer mentioned. “He’s just a little more careful about not saying legally actionable things.”

Heading into the 2024 election, radio host Erick Erickson predicted extra hesitancy in conservative media to embrace claims by former President Donald Trump or anyone in politics preaching election denialism. Fox’s response might be most watched.

PHOTOS: Fox settlement seen as unlikely to alter conservative media

If something, Fox is simply as dominant amongst conservatives right this moment because it was within the aftermath of the 2020 election, the interval addressed by the Dominion lawsuit. That’s when Fox aired false claims that Dominion Voting Systems helped rig the election towards Trump, regardless of many on the community understanding the allegations had been bogus.

Documents within the case uncovered the worry inside Fox that it might lose viewers if the community didn’t inform Trump followers what they wished to listen to.

A former Fox persona, Bill O’Reilly, wrote after the settlement: “This is what happens when money becomes more important than honest information.” His personal expertise, although, exhibits there was cause to be afraid. O’Reilly mentioned he misplaced greater than 1,000 premium subscribers to his web site after telling them the election outcomes wouldn’t be overturned.

Fox’s followers, it appears, had been extra upset with the election reporting than with revelations within the lawsuit about these on the community who didn’t consider the fraud costs and expressed non-public disdain for Trump.

There’s been little noticeable change in Fox’s tv rankings up to now few months, definitely none attributable to the lawsuit. In March, Fox’s web site had 88.7 million distinctive guests, marking its fourth straight month of double-digit good points, mentioned Howard Polskin, whose web site The Righting screens conservative media.

Most conservative web sites both ignored the Dominion lawsuit or gave it cursory protection, he mentioned.

“The coverage on the right would not support at all that some landmark settlement had been reached,” Polskin mentioned. “It was completely misaligned with the magnitude of the news event itself.”

While Fox acknowledged within the settlement the decide’s conclusion that the community had unfold false materials about Dominion, Fox supplied no apology. That possible would have meant extra to Fox’s critics than its followers, anyway, mentioned Megan Duncan, a Virginia Tech communications professor who research information audiences.

To Fox’s followers, criticism of the community wouldn’t matter a lot except it was made by somebody who shared their ideology. For the majority of Fox’s viewers, the settlement might be shortly forgotten - if it was adopted in any respect, she mentioned.

For Fox, that’s all an argument for the significance of holding its viewers completely satisfied.

That viewers is what has made Fox the main cable tv community for a number of years, so worthwhile that it is ready to soak up the $787 million Dominion settlement as a value of doing enterprise.

Fox nonetheless has authorized challenges, with a pending defamation lawsuit by Smartmatic, one other elections know-how firm. But Dominion additionally has a case towards Newsmax, Fox’s chief tv rival for a conservative viewers. Newsmax insists its case is completely different and that it has higher protections towards defamation than Fox did.

But as a smaller firm, if Newsmax is fallacious, a monetary judgment may cripple or kill it, to Fox’s profit, Hemmer mentioned.

“Fox would absolutely go after that audience,” she mentioned.

Fox quickly faces essential negotiations with three massive cable corporations - Comcast, Spectrum and Cox - over carriage charges, the quantity they'll pay to Fox for the precise to supply the community on their techniques, mentioned Angelo Carusone, president of Media Matters for America, a left-leaning media watchdog group.

Ever since an advertiser boycott towards former Fox persona Glenn Beck, largely orchestrated by Media Matters, Fox has targeting boosting carriage charges. It has succeeded to the purpose the place Fox would have a 35% revenue margin even when had no promoting income, he mentioned.

That makes it vital for Fox as an instance to those corporations that it has a big, worthwhile viewers that may be counted on to be loyal at a time individuals are slicing cable service.

Fox may use the conclusion of the lawsuit to construct up its information operation, which has misplaced personalities similar to Chris Wallace and Shepard Smith in recent times, mentioned Chris Stirewalt, an government fired by Fox after the fast, though finally appropriate, choice on election evening 2020 to name Arizona for Democrat Joe Biden within the presidential race.

Fox mentioned that it's doing simply that, saying this previous week that it has elevated its funding in journalism by greater than 50%.

“Being a news organization is expensive and dangerous,” mentioned Stirewalt, now political editor at NewsNation. “Not just expensive because you have to pay to get news but also, expensive because you can lose your audience because sometimes you have to tell them what they don’t want to hear.”

It might be simpler, and good enterprise, to double down on programming that appeals to the attitudes and feelings of viewers, he mentioned. Fox wouldn’t be alone in following that route.

“I don’t envy their choices,” he mentioned.

Erickson, the radio host, mentioned he would anticipate to see better administration management of Fox’s personalities, though this wouldn’t essentially be one thing that viewers would discover. That would revert again to the times of the late Fox chief Roger Ailes, drummed out of the community in a sexual misconduct scandal in 2016.

“Whether you liked Roger Ailes or not, he did understand that you should not lie to your audience,” Erickson mentioned.

The ovations delivered on Thursday evening by an viewers crowded into Hannity’s studio - for him and for Carlson and Ingraham at the start and finish of their exhibits - illustrated a permanent level.

Fox has a number of stable journalists on its payroll however its stars, the chief cause viewers tune in, are those who supply powerful speak and opinion.

“I think they’ve backed themselves into a corner, and that corner is full of Trump supporters,” mentioned Hemmer, the Vanderbilt professor. “That is the business model.”

Copyright © 2023 The Washington Times, LLC.

Content Source: www.washingtontimes.com