The authorities finds its arms considerably tied at current on measures it could actually take to spice up financial development.
The parlous state of public funds - the federal government borrowed £25bn alone in April - implies that neither significant tax cuts nor will increase in public spending that carry productiveness are possible simply now.
So it's no shock to see that, as they seek for different levers to drag, ministers have alighted on the nation's retirement financial savings.
An estimated £1.4trn resides in personal sector "defined benefit" (generally referred to as last wage) pension schemes whereas an additional £1.1trn is estimated to sit down in "defined contribution" (generally referred to as cash buy) schemes.
That is an terrible lot of cash.
Read extraHow the federal government has been compelled to rethink pension coverageGeneration of girls in debt after 'completely devastating' state pension fallout
Most of it, although, is invested in locations apart from the UK inventory market - one of many essential methods by which cash is channelled to companies that want it to assist their enlargement plans.
At the start of the century, UK equities accounted for round half of the cash tied up in UK pension funds, however they now account for beneath 10% of scheme belongings.
Getting pension funds to take a position extra within the UK
Ministers want to see extra of it invested within the UK.
Some of that might be in UK-listed firms however the authorities would additionally wish to see it invested in infrastructure tasks.
The reasoning is that, as infrastructure belongings take a few years to construct and generate an revenue stream, pension funds are the pure and apparent traders in some tasks as a result of they will afford to take a long-term view.
To an extent, that's already occurring. Insurers like Legal & General and M&G have been investing extra in infrastructure for a while now, in addition to different associated actions, resembling constructing rental houses.
But the federal government clearly thinks extra ought to be performed.
Tackling UK pension funds perceived as too risk-averse and cautious
To that finish, ministers are reportedly wanting on the pension safety fund (PPF), the lifeboat scheme which protects individuals with an outlined profit pension when an employer turns into bancrupt.
The Financial Times (FT) reported on Friday that proposals being thought of by the Treasury would see the PPF's remit widened so it has a extra energetic function in taking up firm pension plans that haven't failed.
The Treasury doesn't look like alone in considering alongside these traces.
The Daily Telegraph stories as we speak that the Tony Blair Institute will suggest subsequent week that sponsors of the smallest 4,500 outlined profit schemes ought to be allowed the choice of transferring to the PPF.
The concept behind this - extending the PPF's attain to the pension scheme of firms which are alive in addition to useless - is that the fund, which is a public company and answerable to the Work and Pensions Secretary Mel Stride, may then direct more cash into start-ups and fast-growing companies.
It speaks to the very fact ministers imagine UK pension fund managers are being too risk-averse and too cautious in how they make investments individuals's retirement financial savings.
Ministers imagine that method is holding again the economic system.
As Andrew Griffith, the City minister, instructed the Telegraph as we speak: "We are working on removing points of friction, streamlining our regulations and encouraging a greater culture of risk-taking."
A possible profit for savers
Mr Griffith mentioned, in time, this could additionally profit pensions savers.
He went on: "[We have to] move the emphasis away from funds running themselves for the minimum cost to funds looking properly at performance and that is what matters here because it is about making sure long-term savers get the most prosperous retirement that they can."
Beefing up the PPF's remit is certainly one of solely plenty of concepts being kicked round.
A Canadian-style concept
Another that has attracted curiosity is Canadian-style "collective defined contribution" schemes.
These schemes, which have additionally been broadly adopted in Denmark, the Netherlands and Australia, goal to supply a mid-point between extra beneficiant outlined profit schemes and the much less beneficiant outlined contribution schemes by which employers and staff pool retirement financial savings right into a fund aimed to offer members with an revenue in retirement.
Unlike an outlined profit scheme, that revenue is just not assured, however not like an outlined contribution scheme it might additionally search to guard members from the vagaries of market efficiency and the chance {that a} employee would possibly see the worth of their financial savings plunge in a crash shortly earlier than they had been as a consequence of begin accessing them in retirement.
These schemes have been touted as spreading threat between the generations and Royal Mail has set one up for its staff.
Not everyone seems to be satisfied
Not everyone seems to be eager on this concept, although.
John Ralfe, the impartial pensions guide, has identified the very act of pooling retirement financial savings doesn't of itself increase funding returns for retirees - it nonetheless all hangs on how efficiently, or in any other case, that cash is invested.
Another concept being broadly mentioned is the thought of directing pension schemes to position 5% of their belongings right into a £50bn development fund that might, for instance, spend money on the UK's burgeoning tech sector.
It was floated as an concept earlier this 12 months by Nicholas Lyons, the Lord Mayor of London, who's at present on secondment from the life and pensions firm Phoenix Group.
Mr Lyons's concept has not gained common assist - Amanda Blanc, the chief govt of insurer Aviva, mentioned this week she didn't suppose compulsion was a good suggestion.
The Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association, the commerce physique for these concerned in office pensions, additionally dislikes the thought of compulsion.
Listen and subscribe to the Ian King Business Podcast right here
But somebody who does suppose it's price taking a look at is Rachel Reeves, the shadow chancellor, who instructed the Financial Times (FT) this week she backed the thought.
Ms Reeves mentioned compulsion may not be essential, given the goodwill within the sector in the direction of investing extra within the UK, however added: "nothing is off the table".
She instructed the FT, in the identical interview, she additionally favoured consolidation of smaller pension schemes to extra simply construct scale.
The path of journey, then, is evident. It feels as if extra authorities intervention in how occupational pension schemes are operated and the way they make investments is coming, no matter who wins the following election.
Content Source: information.sky.com
Please share by clicking this button!
Visit our site and see all other available articles!