Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene was rebuked by the Homeland Security Committee on Wednesday after she known as DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas a “liar.”

But the Georgia Republican did handle to get by the censors and into the committee’s official report her allegation that Rep. Eric Swalwell had a “sexual relationship with a Chinese spy.”

The wild affair came about throughout a heated listening to with Mr. Mayorkas, which noticed Republicans mocking him for evasive solutions and Democrats defending him as higher than the Trump administration.

Mr. Swalwell, California Democrat, used his time for inquiries to poke at Republicans over complaints concerning the FBI. He particularly known as Ms. Greene “anti-police.”

She shot again: “That was quite entertaining for someone who had a sexual relationship with a Chinese spy, and everyone knows it.”

Mr. Swalwell instantly demanded that her “words be taken down” — a type of parliamentary rebuke that signifies what was stated is past the bounds of decorum.

SEE ALSO: New proof emerges that Biden household profited from human trafficking, say House investigators

Committee Chairman Mark Green, Tennessee Republican, dominated towards the request. Democrats then appealed however have been defeated on an 11-9 vote.

Ms. Greene was apparently referencing stories from late 2020 that Christine Fang, often known as Fang Fang, was a political supporter of Mr. Swalwell. The lady additionally cozied as much as different politicians and, in accordance with Axios, developed relationships with two Midwestern mayors.

Mr. Swalwell refused to say on the time whether or not he had a sexual relationship with the girl.

After popping out on high of Mr. Swalwell, Ms. Greene then went after Mr. Mayorkas, blaming him for permitting the surge of fentanyl that she stated is killing faculty children.

When he stated the federal government is combating fentanyl, she jumped in.

“You’re a liar. You are letting this go on,” she stated.

Democrats pounced, saying she had violated the foundations once more. Ms. Greene was given an opportunity to withdraw her phrases however refused.

“I will not withdraw my remarks because the facts show the proof,” she stated.

That’s when Mr. Green, the chairman, stepped in together with his ruling, saying she had impugned the secretary’s character.

At that time, Democrats questioned what the distinction was between her jab at Mr. Mayorkas and the one towards Mr. Swalwell.

Mr. Green stated it was a judgment name.

“It does not fit the rules, by the ruling of the chair,” he stated.

Content Source: www.washingtontimes.com