NEW YORK — The jury listening to an recommendation columnist’s claims that she was raped by Donald Trump may start deliberations as quickly as Tuesday, and it'll have broad latitude in deciding the truthfulness of the allegations towards the previous president.

The author E. Jean Carroll, 79, testified that Trump raped her in 1996 inside a dressing room on the luxurious Bergdorf Goodman retailer in Manhattan after they'd an opportunity encounter and shopped collectively for lingerie.

Trump, 76, has stated he by no means raped Carroll and was by no means together with her on the division retailer. He has been absent from the trial, although jurors noticed parts of his videotaped deposition. He has accused Carroll of constructing up allegations to gasoline gross sales of her 2019 memoir.

The jury’s resolution within the trial - which entails a civil case and never a legal one - might come right down to who they consider extra. Here’s extra on how the jury will attain its verdict:

WHEN WILL DELIBERATIONS BEGIN?

Closing arguments are tentatively scheduled for Monday with an expectation that attorneys for Carroll and Trump will end their statements by the tip of the day.

The choose is predicted to learn directions on the regulation to the jury on Tuesday, with deliberations to start instantly afterward.

U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan gave Trump a final likelihood to request to testify, however the former president’s attorneys indicated he was prone to decline that provide.

WHAT WILL JURORS DECIDE?

Kaplan instructed the 9 jurors on the trial’s begin that the central declare pertains to “battery.”

He stated that in a civil case, battery may result from even the slightest illegal touching of one other individual.

“The law does not draw a line between different degrees of violence. It totally prohibits all unconsented-to touching from the least to the most violent that a reasonable person would find offensive. In other words, anything from a gentle but unwanted peck on the cheek to stabbing somebody with a knife could be battery for purposes of a civil case like this one,” Kaplan stated.

The jurors can be requested to resolve whether or not Carroll has confirmed that Trump dedicated battery. If they resolve that Trump dedicated battery, they're anticipated to be requested to what diploma. After that, Carroll’s legal professional has proposed that jurors be requested individually whether or not Carroll has confirmed that Trump engaged in forcible touching, sexual abuse and rape. The choose has but to decide on that proposal.

The trial additionally entails a declare by Carroll that Trump made defamatory feedback whereas denying her allegations.

For defamation, jurors can be requested if Carroll had confirmed that Trump’s assertion was defamatory and whether or not clear and convincing proof had confirmed that Trump made the assertion maliciously.

WHAT IS AT STAKE?

If a jury agrees that Carroll has confirmed her claims of battery and defamation, they'll award compensatory and punitive damages. The quantity is as much as the jury.

There isn’t any likelihood Trump will go to jail because of a case.

WHY IS IT A CIVIL RATHER THAN A CRIMINAL CASE?

Carroll acknowledged throughout her testimony that she by no means went to police.

Her resolution to not report a criminal offense for therefore lengthy guidelines out the opportunity of prosecutors bringing legal fees towards Trump. Until lately, it additionally would have prevented Carroll from bringing a lawsuit. But New York final yr enacted a regulation quickly letting sexual assault victims sue their alleged abusers, regardless of how way back the assault occurred.

Because it's a civil case, Trump was not required to be in court docket.

Unlike in a legal trial, the place a prosecutor might need to show the case past an affordable doubt, a civil jury decides based mostly on “preponderance of the evidence,” that means whether or not one thing is extra prone to be true than not.

To show the defamation declare, Carroll is required to show her allegations by clear and convincing proof, which is a better authorized customary than preponderance of the proof.

Copyright © 2023 The Washington Times, LLC.

Content Source: www.washingtontimes.com