Republican-led committee calls off vote to carry Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg in contempt

Read more

WASHINGTON — A House committee referred to as off a vote Thursday on a advice that Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg be held in contempt of Congress for failing to completely provide paperwork associated to an investigation into supposed censorship by tech firms of conservatives.

Read more

Rep. Jim Jordan, a Republican and chair of the Judiciary Committee, tweeted shortly earlier than the committee was to fulfill that, “Based on Facebook’s newfound commitment to fully cooperate with the Committee’s investigation, the Committee has decided to hold contempt in abeyance. For now.”

Read more

Jordan added that contempt remains to be on the desk and can be used if “Facebook fails to cooperate in FULL.”

Read more

If the committee had moved ahead, it might have been as much as House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., to carry a full House vote on the contempt decision as early as this fall, after the August recess.

Read more

If the House have been to carry Zuckerberg in contempt, the Justice Department would determine whether or not to prosecute him.

Read more

Andy Stone, a spokesperson for Meta, has mentioned the corporate has delivered greater than 50,000 pages of each inner and exterior paperwork to the committee since February. He added that additionally they have made present and former staff accessible for interviews with lawmakers.

Read more

But the committee mentioned Meta has produced solely paperwork between Meta and exterior entities, and a small subset of related inner paperwork. It’s in search of extra inner firm paperwork, which it mentioned would make clear how Meta evaluated and responded to requests or directives to censor content material.

Read more

Democrats are skeptical of Jordan’s effort. Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., mentioned shortly earlier than Jordan’s announcement that “it doesn’t seem to have any basis in facts or reality, but that’s consistent with what the Judiciary Committee has done during this Congress.”

Read more

Copyright © 2023 The Washington Times, LLC.

Read more

Content Source: www.washingtontimes.com

Read more

Did you like this story?

Please share by clicking this button!

Visit our site and see all other available articles!

US 99 News