Elizabeth Holmes has launched an attraction in opposition to what her legal professionals say is an "unjust" conviction over the Theranos scandal.

The 39-year-old was convicted of 4 counts of fraud in January 2022 and sentenced to an 11-year jail time period final November.

Earlier this month she misplaced a bid to remain out of jail whereas she appealed in opposition to her conviction, which means she should report back to jail on 27 April.

She has now filed an attraction in opposition to her conviction, arguing the case in opposition to her "parroted the public narrative" that she knowingly and deliberately misrepresented to buyers the capabilities of Theranos know-how.

She began Theranos with the promise of delivering revolutionary blood-testing know-how that would examine for dozens of ailments directly.

She raised almost $1bn (£840m) from a bunch of high-profile buyers, and the corporate was as soon as valued at $9bn (£7.3bn).

Holmes turned America's youngest-ever self-made feminine billionaire by 2014, however the tech was uncovered as bogus and the corporate shortly got here crashing down.

In the attraction filed on Monday, her legal professionals argue the narrative of figuring out misrepresentation that impressed documentaries, podcasts and a TV drama was totally different to what performed out in actuality.

"Highly credentialed Theranos scientists told Holmes in real time the technology worked. Outsiders who reviewed the technology said it worked," her legal professionals wrote.

"Theranos' groundbreaking developments received many patents. And in 2015 the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) approved an assay on Theranos' proprietary technology," the submitting continued.

Read extra:How Elizabeth Holmes went from billionaire to behind barsHolmes 'has ambition to rise once more'

The legal professionals additionally argued the federal government dedicated violations throughout its prosecution, which the judged "indulged" as he "abus[ed]" his discretion, in response to the submitting.

They argued key excluded testimony from Holmes' co-defendant, Sunny Balwani, implicated Balwani in operating the corporate's funds.

The jury's responsible verdict for Holmes was "unjust," the legal professionals wrote.

If they aren't profitable in getting a brand new trial, Holmes and her legal professionals are additionally in search of a discount to her sentence, which they known as "severe" and erroneously determined.

Content Source: information.sky.com