For the previous decade, the joke round Mets pitchers has been that they spend extra time injured than energetic. There’s no scarcity of examples; Jacob deGrom and Noah Syndergaard spring to my thoughts first, however Max Scherzer and Justin Verlander handled accidents of their time in Queens, too. Edwin Díaz simply missed the 2023 season. Zack Wheeler by no means fairly lived as much as his potential when he was there, and accidents had been a key cause why. Matt Harvey, Seth Lugo, Steven Matz — heck, right here’s a narrative from 2017 in regards to the Mets’ damage woes, which had been already a trope earlier than their latest woes.

In that sense, Coleman Crow is the platonic splendid of a Mets pitcher. He joined the group in June, a part of the bundle the Angels despatched to New York in alternate for Eduardo Escobar. At the time, he hadn’t pitched since late April because of an elbow damage. His first notable resolution as a Met was to get Tommy John surgical procedure for that elbow; he’s now monitoring for a return on the very finish of subsequent yr, or doubtlessly in 2025. He’s been a Met for roughly six months and thrown precisely zero pitches for them in that point.

Or possibly I ought to have mentioned: he was a Met for roughly six months. On Wednesday, the Mets traded him to the Brewers in alternate for Adrian Houser and Tyrone Taylor, ending his tenure with the workforce. You assume Harvey was typically injured? Crow dialed it as much as a completely totally different stage, albeit within the minors. It’s the type of efficiency we would not see once more for some time.

Now that I’ve used Crow for my amusing, semi-Mets-bashing intro, I’m going to shelve him for some time to speak about the remainder of the commerce, however don’t fear, Crowheads; we’ll cowl your man on the finish. See, Crow was hardly a scorching commodity within the commerce market. We had him down as a 40 FV prospect earlier than his damage, and the chance has solely elevated since then. He was unprotected on this yr’s Rule 5 draft. Teams weren’t precisely pulling down the Mets’ doorways attempting to commerce for him.

You can infer, then, that the bundle of Houser and Taylor most likely weren’t important to Milwaukee’s 2024 plans. Houser is an efficient sufficient pitcher that I’m type of shocked he ended up as surplus; throughout 5 years of swingman responsibility (97 begins, 23 reduction appearances), he’s compiled an ERA round 4.00, with peripherals that match. That works out to 1.8 WAR per 150 innings pitched — and coincidentally, he compiled 1.8 WAR in 2023, throughout solely 111 innings.

Houser has one major talent: holding the ball on the bottom. His finest and most-used pitch is a sinker that lives within the 91–93-mph vary and appears impossibly heavy, dropping two inches greater than the common sinker thrown in its tough velocity vary. He enhances that with a ton of secondaries, none of which I’m in love with; he has a slider, a curveball, a changeup, and a four-seamer, however each of our pitching fashions agree that every one 4 are below-average choices.

Houser’s sinker induced fewer grounders in 2023 than it had in his profession earlier than this yr. You may assume that might doom him, and in reality, his house run fee shot up because of all the extra fly balls he gave up. But 2023 was additionally his only season within the majors, as a result of his former largest weak point — command — grew to become a energy. For the primary time in his profession, he walked fewer than 8% of opposing batters, and all of the secondary metrics agree that this seems like an actual enchancment. He lived within the strike zone extra typically, obtained forward within the depend at a great clip, and garnered each extra swinging strikes and extra known as strikes than his 2022 marketing campaign.

If you’re speaking your self into the great model of Houser, that’s an ideal narrative. His sinker seems nearly as good as ever by way of motion, although its velocity dipped a bit because the yr went on. His depressed groundball fee may disappear in 2024 whereas his newfound command stays. That would make him one thing like an off-brand Logan Webb or Framber Valdez; these guys have wonderful second pitches to catapult them to a different stage, however a worse model of a superb pitcher remains to be one thing price getting excited over.

Even if he doesn’t handle that more-grounders-better-command trick, Houser seems like a wonderfully competent fifth starter to me. His xFIP has hovered within the mid-to-low 4s, and his profession mark is a good 4.25. He doesn’t appear notably liable to onerous contact; even with an unremarkable groundball/fly ball ratio in 2023, he wasn’t surrendering an irregular quantity of barrels. There are at all times going to be nits to select if you’re taking a look at starters who match on the again finish of a rotation (sturdiness, velo, strikeouts, command, sustainability, the listing goes on), however all issues thought-about, most groups might use a man like Houser someplace on their 40-man roster.

Honestly, even the Brewers might use a man like Houser. He made 21 begins for them final yr, roughly filling Brandon Woodruff’s spot within the rotation. Woodruff is not on the workforce, so there’s an apparent spot for Houser, however the Brewers crammed that spot earlier this winter by signing Joe Ross. Ross isn’t precisely a rotation lock — the final time he threw greater than three innings was in 2021, because of damage and rehab — however the workforce noticed sufficient upside to provide him a shot at beginning anyway.

That transfer meant that considered one of Houser or Colin Rea wouldn’t have a rotation spot, and given how Milwaukee tries to stretch its price range so far as attainable, the loser of that individual competitors was seemingly headed out of city. Houser is because of make roughly $5.5 million in arbitration this offseason; Rea signed a one-year deal for $4.5 million with a membership possibility tacked onto the again finish. That most likely made the choice simpler: ship the costlier man off to the workforce with cash to burn in alternate for a marginal prospect.

Taylor is on this commerce, too, and his inclusion is even simpler to know. The Brewers are within the unusual scenario of getting too many outfielders for their very own good. Christian Yelich had a resurgent, on-base pushed season and isn’t going anyplace. Sal Frelick, Garrett Mitchell, and Joey Wiemer all appeared adequate in 2023 that the workforce is on the lookout for area to play them in 2024. That doesn’t even depend Jackson Chourio, whose file contract foreshadows an early and everlasting call-up. Even with 4 spots (counting DH), Taylor didn’t actually match into the image anymore.

Like Houser, Taylor could be a completely good complementary possibility on a great workforce as a fourth outfielder who can deal with heart in a pinch and hits sufficient that you just gained’t be embarrassed to run him on the market. His 101 profession wRC+ most likely overstates his expertise, however not by a ton; Steamer tasks him for a 95 wRC+ subsequent yr. There are actually draw back dangers: his aggressive strategy might need gone too far in 2023, when he chased almost 40% of pitches exterior the strike zone and obtained on base at a career-low .267 clip, which torpedoed his total batting line. But even in a down yr, Taylor’s defensive chops — he’s quick and has an enormous arm — made him helpful. Just not, you recognize, helpful to a workforce with a bushelful of younger outfielders, notably contemplating that he'll seemingly make almost $2 million in arbitration; he needed to go.

The Mets are absolutely excited to be on the receiving finish of Milwaukee’s unburdening. They wanted pitching and outfielders badly; we’ve penciled in Houser as their fourth starter and Taylor as their beginning left fielder. I’m not utterly positive whether or not they’re going to spend 2024 taking pictures for the playoffs or laying extra of a groundwork for the long run, however in both case, each Milwaukee castoffs will likely be useful in filling within the gaps not occupied by the workforce’s mixture of stars and fascinating kids.

The actual profit to Milwaukee right here isn’t Crow; it’s wage reduction. The Brewers have much more want for $7 million in price discount than the Mets do, having constructed their complete group round attempting to pay lower than that for common gamers, and the Mets don’t have a lot of a farm system to attract from once they’re on the lookout for low-end regulars. That makes me love this commerce for New York, which has struggled to get guys like Houser and Taylor with out dipping into free company or buying and selling away helpful minor leaguers. Merely absorbing their contracts and sending over a rehabbing pitcher looks as if a a lot better technique to go about issues.

My solely query, then, is whether or not that is the very best return the Brewers might have gotten for his or her gamers. In the brief time period, I feel the reply is clearly sure; in any other case, another person would have traded for them. My guess is that they might have pried barely extra from somebody for Houser in the event that they dangled him all winter; pitching, in spite of everything, is in excessive demand in every single place, and there are solely so many free brokers nonetheless on the market. But that transfer comes with threat: maintain Houser in reserve ready for somebody to bowl you over with a suggestion, and also you may by chance nonetheless have him on the roster on opening day.

That doesn’t sound like a catastrophe, however let me pitch it this manner: the Brewers can most likely use their $7 million in financial savings to enhance their workforce with a veteran infielder or reliever, and so they couldn’t actually do this in the event that they each saved Houser and caught to a price range. In my eyes, this commerce is all about threat mitigation: they wished to finish the offseason with Houser and Taylor off the books, and they also leapt on the first likelihood to clear each of their salaries and get at the least a token return.

Perhaps that return will find yourself being greater than a token. Crow appeared superior in a laughably small pattern in 2023, placing out greater than a 3rd of opposing batters and strolling solely 7%. He carried out effectively in 2022, in addition; if not for his damage, he may already be knocking on the door of the majors as an up-and-down, command-over-stuff swingman kind. The Brewers appear to get essentially the most out of these varieties of pitchers very often. Eric Lauer is the newest instance I can consider, however they’ve demonstrated a knack for determining what small changes can take tweeners over the road from minor league out-getter to huge league contributor.

Yep, you guessed it: I’m awarding this commerce the inevitable win-win grade that you just absolutely anticipated if you heard the Mets and Brewers had been making a swap. One workforce wants cash, the opposite expertise; it’s hardly rocket science. But I feel that the Brewers are valuing threat aversion fairly extremely on this deal, and that the Mets had been good to leap on the chance so as to add two dependable rotation gamers at a negligible (to them) price. I’ll award them a capital WIN, the Brewers a lower-case win, and me a well-merited stroll across the neighborhood with scorching chocolate.

Content Source: blogs.fangraphs.com