A seething Russian President Vladimir Putin denounced it as a “treacherous mutiny” that was “doomed to fail.”

Wagner Group mercenary chief Yevgeny Prigozhin referred to as it a “demonstration of our protest” in opposition to the incompetently waged battle in Ukraine by Mr. Putin’s generals.

President Biden, following a chat with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, insisted the U.S. had nothing to do with it.

The solely factor that appeared clear Monday was that the fallout from the aborted, semi-coup staged by Mr. Prigozhin’s forces over the weekend is for certain to be felt for months to come back.

Those occasions — together with the Wagner Group’s seizure of a southern Russian city, a surprising armed advance on Moscow that encountered little authorities resistance, and a still-murky deal to name off the insurrection and permit Mr. Prigozhin to relocate his operations to neighboring Belarus — clearly shook Mr. Putin and his high aides, already on the defensive over a 16-month invasion of Ukraine wherein little has gone based on plan.

“The entire incident just showcased a wide variety of weaknesses of the Russian state,” Catherine Doxsee, affiliate director for transnational threats on the Center for Strategic and International Studies, mentioned in an interview with Bloomberg News.

“What we are coming into is a period where not only are Putin and Prigozhin are competing and jostling for continued control of Wagner’s broader business empire in places like Africa and the Middle East but we also have a huge precedent set for how weak the Russian state really is, how overextended it is. … For someone who relies on his strong man image, [Putin] now looks very weak.”

Despite their lengthy, tangled historical past relationship again to their joint rise to energy in St. Petersburg within the Nineties, a tense Mr. Putin used an unscheduled nationwide tackle Monday night time to vent his fury towards Mr. Prigozhin whereas interesting to his hundreds of employed warriors to come back again into the fold.

Those behind the weekend insurrection “betrayed their country and their people,” Mr. Putin mentioned at one level. The enemies of Russia “wanted Russian soldiers to kill each other, to kill military personnel and civilians, so that in the end Russia would lose, and our society would split, choke in bloody civil strife.”

He once more pressed Wagner Group fighters to signal beforehand provided contracts to develop into a part of the common Russian military, the obvious spark that lit the fuse for Mr. Prigozhin’s rebellion, saying, “The majority of Wagner commanders and fighters are patriots” who have been “used covertly against their brothers-in-arms.”

Mr. Putin’s remarks got here shortly after Mr. Prigozhin — who was not talked about by identify within the president’s tackle — launched his personal 11-minute video from an undisclosed location denying he had focused Mr. Putin and making an attempt to justify his revolt.

On his Telegram social media website Monday, Mr. Prigozhin denied the operation was an try and overthrow the federal government of his longtime benefactor, Russian President Vladimir Putin. He referred to as it “a march for justice” concentrating on Russian navy leaders who he claimed have botched the invasion of Ukraine.

“Wagner was going to be disestablished and we protested that decision,” Mr. Prigozhin mentioned Monday. “We stopped when it became clear that blood [would] be spilled.”

Mr. Prigozhin has made no secret of his contempt for Mr. Putin’s high navy aides and the way they've performed the Ukraine battle, concentrating on specifically Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu and General Staff chief Gen. Valery Gerasimov, saying they've badly mishandled the invasion and denied Wagner Group forces ammunition and wanted assist to assist in the combat.

Separately, President Biden used a White House occasion Monday to make his first remarks on the Russian disaster, saying the U.S. performed no function within the shadowy revolt. Mr. Biden mentioned he had assured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a telephone name that Washington would proceed to assist Kyiv.

Wagner’s management determined to march on the southern Russian metropolis of Rostov-on-Don as a result of it's the command and logistics hub for Russian navy operations in Ukraine. The non-public mercenary agency, which has fought alongside Russian troops within the Ukraine marketing campaign, briefly held the town and was touring largely unopposed on the street to Moscow when Mr. Prigozhin referred to as off the motion and agreed to journey to neighboring Belarus.

“The march’s aim was not to remove the government, but [was targeted] at the bureaucracy and issues in our country that contributed to so many mistakes in Ukraine,” Mr. Prigozhin mentioned.

He acknowledged that some Russian airmen had been killed in confrontations sparked by the rebellion over the weekend. He mentioned his agency “regretted that they were required to carry out strikes against aircraft but they were hitting our forces with bombs and rocket strikes.”

Praising Belarus President Alexander Lukashenko for brokering a deal to finish the preventing and shield his forces, Mr. Prigozhin mentioned the Wagner military’s almost profitable march into Russia ought to function a “template” for a way the Kremlin ought to have staged the preliminary invasion of Ukraine, which didn't obtain its major purpose of taking Kyiv and is now slowed down making an attempt to carry off a Ukrainian counteroffensive within the jap and southern elements of the nation.

Watching and questioning

While U.S. intelligence had reportedly picked up the intensifying animosity between the Wagner Group and Russia’s Defense Ministry and high generals in Ukraine, President Biden and Western leaders have been in a largely wait-and-wonder mode making an attempt to gauge the influence of the weekend’s gorgeous occasions on the Russian political scene. But Mr. Biden made some extent of claiming it was pointless to attempt to shift the blame from Moscow to Washington.

President Biden advised reporters Monday he had briefed “hour by hour” on the weekend’s occasions and had convened a video convention with allies to coordinate a Western response. He needed to make it possible for Mr. Putin didn't blame the gorgeous problem to his management on NATO or the U.S.

“We made clear that we were not involved. We had nothing to do with it,” Mr. Biden mentioned in the beginning of a White House occasion on web entry. “This was part of a struggle within the Russian system.”

“We’re going to keep assessing the fallout of this weekend’s events and the implications for Russia and Ukraine,” Mr. Biden mentioned. “It’s still too early to reach a definitive conclusion about where this is going.”

Mr. Biden mentioned he spoke with Ukraine’s Mr. Zelenskyy to affirm that it doesn't matter what occurs in Russia, the U.S. would proceed to assist its protection in opposition to invading Russian forces. The Pentagon is planning to announce it's sending as much as $500 million in navy support to Ukraine, together with greater than 50 closely armored automobiles and extra missiles for air protection techniques, U.S. officers advised the Associated Press Monday.

National Security Council spokesman John Kirby mentioned the U.S. additionally used diplomatic channels to let Moscow understand it thought-about the Wagner revolt an “internal Russian matter.”

He declined to say whether or not the U.S. thought-about it to be an tried coup or mutiny — or if it deserved another label.

“We’re not slapping a bumper sticker on it,” Mr. Kirby mentioned.

European leaders have been equally cautious of their assessments, though the final consensus was that Mr. Putin had suffered a critical blow to his once-unchallenged authority.

European Union overseas coverage chief Josep Borrell, chairing a gathering of EU overseas ministers in Luxembourg Monday, mentioned the Wagner incident dramatically illustrated the strains Mr. Putin’s determination to invade Ukraine had positioned on Russia.

“The monster that Putin created with Wagner, the monster is biting him now,”  Mr. Borrell mentioned. “… The political system is showing fragilities, and the military power is cracking.”

The response was equally unsure in Russia’s most necessary ally — China.

Chinese officers on Monday voiced assist for Russia following the weekend’s occasions, in what analysts say displays considerations China might lose a key ally in its battle in opposition to the democratic West.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning reaffirmed Beijing’s backing for Mr. Putin, calling the Wagner Group “incident” a “Russian internal affair.”

But with China’s assist got here a transparent undercurrent of unease. “Recent developments in Russia have been unsettling to the Chinese leadership,” mentioned Kurt Campbell, the White House China coverage czar, advised a Monday session on the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 

Ms. Mao insisted Beijing’s strategic partnership with Russia stays sound and said that “China supports Russia in maintaining national stability and achieving development and prosperity, and we believe in Russia’s ability to do so.”

The two nations remained in shut communication in the course of the disaster, she mentioned. Deputy Foreign Minister Andrey Rudenko swiftly traveled to Beijing for conferences because the weekend’s occasion unfolded. The Chinese Foreign Ministry mentioned in a brief assertion that Foreign Ministry Qin Gang and Mr. Rudenko shared views on relations and regional problems with widespread concern.

Ukraine rejoices

In Kyiv, the response was extra open — and extra hopeful. Ukraine efficiently turned again Russia’s preliminary thrusts within the battle in 2022, however a just-beginning counteroffensive within the south and east had produced solely modest returns in latest days earlier than the information of the Wagner insurrection broke.

As Mr. Zelenskyy made one other journey to go to Ukrainian troops on the entrance traces, the traditional knowledge that Mr. Putin had the ability and sources to outwait Ukraine in a battle of attrition was instantly turned on its head.

Andriy Yusov, a high intelligence official within the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense, advised the Ukrainian Interfax information service in an interview that essentially the most putting factor in regards to the revolt was how little resistance the Wagner Group insurgents encountered and the way few main Russian figures rushed to assist Mr. Putin publicly whereas the battle hung within the steadiness.

“Before our eyes, the transformation of the so-called Russian Federation is already beginning,” he argued. “We saw the unwillingness of the security forces, officials of various ranks to publicly defend the Putin regime,” Mr. Yusov mentioned. 

The regime “does not fully control the situation, and the whole world saw it.”

Two high U.S. Russian analysts agreed that maybe essentially the most putting revelation of the previous three days was the absence of sturdy resistance to Mr. Prigozhin’s problem to the Kremlin, with movies exhibiting residents cheering Wagner Group models in Rostov-on-Don and the mercenary forces calling off the insurrection earlier than encountering any actual resistance from common Russian forces.

There is not any clear proof of a wider plot involving different Russian navy leaders aside from Mr. Prigozhin, mentioned Ambassador Stephen Sestanovich, a professor of worldwide diplomacy at Columbia University.

“It is truly remarkable that [Mr. Prigozhin’s] forces went into Rostov-on-Don and captured the regional Russian military headquarters apparently without resistance and then advanced two-thirds of the way to Moscow,” former U.S. Ambassador Stephen Sestanovich, now a professor of worldwide diplomacy at Columbia University, mentioned Monday. “It doesn’t sound like there was substantial resistance from the Russian military. It looks to me like many of [them] just decided to stand down.”

Former NATO Supreme Allied Commander Gen. Philip M. Breedlove added that the Wagner fighters and armored automobiles “really met almost zero resistance.”

Mr. Prigozhin’s drive “was attacked once by helicopters that were shot down. There was at least quiescence by a lot of the local commanders and didn’t bring out troops for armor-on-armor pushback,” Gen. Breedlove mentioned.

But the ex-NATO chief additionally cautioned in opposition to inflated expectations for Ukrainian forces, who nonetheless face a decided. dug-in Russian line of defense as they attempt to reclaim occupied lands.

The normal mentioned Ukraine’s strategy to preventing a a lot bigger drive like Russia has been “very mature.” So far, their forces have centered on probing the entrance traces, on the lookout for optimum places to assault the Russian invaders.

“They are fighting with less against a country with more. We need to caution continued patience with the way that the Ukrainians are approaching this,” he mentioned. “They’ve used less than one-third of their force so far and they have a large amount of capability yet to bring forward.”

• Bill Gertz and Guy Taylor contributed to this report, which was primarily based partially on wire service accounts.

Content Source: www.washingtontimes.com